Washington---Barack Obama's admission that he has an incomplete strategy to combat the Islamic State group is politically toxic, but history shows many of his predecessors also decided that "muddling through" a crisis was the least-worst option.
They were seven small words that did not help the 44th president one little bit after a G7 meeting in the clean air of the Bavarian Alps: "We don't yet have a complete strategy."
He may have been referring specifically to a spluttering US "train and equip" mission, but it has been 10 months since Obama started bombing the radical Islamist group and nine months since he first admitted to having no coherent strategy to fight them.
In the interim, the group has beheaded and subjugated its way through Iraq, Syria and Libya, destabilizing the entire Middle East in the process.
The self-proclaimed Islamic State has also attracted support from alienated European and American youths, who are already returning home and bringing a radical ideology with them.
In light of this national security threat, Obama's critics asked, how does he still not know what he is doing?
Veteran Republican Senator John McCain accused Obama of doing nothing to stop a Christian genocide.
"It is a failure of leadership," said Rick Perry, a Republican presidential candidate keen to display his foreign policy chops after a 2012 campaign in which he was painted as a neophyte to global affairs.
"If I were commander-in-chief, it would not take nine months to work with our military leaders to develop a complete strategy to destroy ISIS and protect American security interests and values," he said, using another acronym for the group.
Not so, according to Michael Bohn, who may be in a good position to know.
- No simple solutions -
During Republican president Ronald Reagan's second term, Bohn was director of the White House Situation Room, the secure basement complex where the most sensitive national security meetings take place.
A former naval intelligence officer, since then he has studied in detail 17 instances of presidential decision-making -- spanning the Truman and Obama administrations -- and wrote up his findings in a book called "Presidents in Crisis."
Bohn says that every commander-in-chief walks into the White House wanting to take bold, decisive steps, but sooner or later learns the necessity of working in increments.
"Presidents when they are faced with just really tough situations, they rarely find simple easy solutions," he told AFP.
AFP
